In the world of HEALTH, the words “GOOD” and BAD” are frequently used by doctors to assist patients with treatment options. I have used these two words frequently to help my patients qualify the recommendations I’ve suggested to them. It is important, however, to base personal decisions NOT ON THE WORDS THEMSELVES, but rather the CONTEXT they are used.
FOR EXAMPLE: FIRE IS GOOD
If a person was lost in the mountains during a snowstorm, fire could prevent a person from freezing to death. Fire would, therefore, be “GOOD.”
If this same person fell asleep on a couch with a cigarette smoldering that resulted in a house fire destroying the entire residence, fire would be considered “BAD.”
When it comes to HEALTH, context is EVERYTHING!
In third world countries where unsanitary conditions result in poor hygiene and unsanitary water is used for drinking water, vaccines offer a level of protection in lieu of the risks these same vaccines are associated with. Vaccines (in this context) would be seen as “GOOD“
In developed countries where good hygiene and clean water is the norm, mandatory vaccinations result in a small percentage of permanently brain injured children. Vaccines (in this context for these children) are “BAD.”
In the United States, injuries associated with vaccines are rarely (if ever) made public. There is great concern that releasing this information might cause FEAR preventing families from vaccinating their children. These injuries are REAL, DOCUMENTED and destroy many of the families living with this REALITY.
When the Supreme Court had to make a ruling regarding the:
use of vaccines (using the Supreme Court’s terminology:) they identified a reality, but deemed vaccines appropriate for the benefits they potentially offered.
ONCE AGAIN, CONTEXT IS ESSENTIAL
Simply put, the courts ruled in favor of vaccines (as “GOOD”) and appropriate for use.
They also stated the REALITY of SERIOUS DANGER associated with vaccine use; that SERIOUS IRREVERSIBLE HARM will come to a SEGMENT of the population. This “BAD” outcome is an “unavoidable” REAL consequence of the vaccine program. The following are two vaccine court rulings that NEVER RECEIVED MAJOR NETWORK MEDIA COVERAGE.
“In a recently published December 13, 2012 vaccine court ruling, hundreds of thousands of dollars were awarded to Ryan Mojabi, whose parents described how “MMR vaccinations” caused a “severe and debilitating injury to his brain.”
“The government suffered a second major defeat when young Emily Moller from Houston won compensation following vaccine-related brain injury that, once again, involved MMR vaccine.”
The purpose of this post is to present WITHOUT BIAS clarity that ALL CURRENT VACCINES pose a serious health risk to an UNKNOWN segment of the population. This segment only becomes known after receiving the vaccine.
It is essential to understand these vaccines are capable of causing PERMANENT NEUROLOGICAL INJURIES!
THIS IS NOT OPINION!
EVERY DOCTOR IS LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO INFORM PARENTS OF THIS POTENTIAL RISK.
Some of you may feel this is ONLY TWO CASES worth several hundred thousand dollars. Since rulings in the vaccine courts do not receive media coverage, the average consumer is unaware that:
the vaccine injury courts have awarded over:
$3,000,000,000 (THREE BILLION DOLLARS)
to families that have proven their children have sustained injuries from these vaccinations.
I call the moral of this story,
How many doctors do you believe consider it their moral and ethical responsibility to explain the potential lifelong injuries as well as the diseases the vaccine is designed to combat prior to administering these vaccines? This LEGAL responsibility is RARELY fulfilled. Why do YOU think this is the case?
How many families do you think might reconsider their decision if they had a magic ball to see the future BEFORE their child’s injury actually happened? Choosing to participate in the vaccine program is a personal decision each family should have the right to make.
Pressuring doctors (with their EMPLOYMENT) to maintain patient vaccination quotas causes many doctors intense personal conflict. A program that initially started with honorable intentions has mutated into a multi billion dollar industry protected by the law from ALL LIABILITY and incentivized to produce unlimited numbers of new vaccines (without quality research and with regulatory agencies having financial conflicts of interest of their own.)
PERSONALLY, SO IT IS CLEAR TO ALL READERS, I SUPPORT PARENT’S RIGHTS TO VACCINATE, ABSTAIN OR CHOOSE A DIFFERENT VACCINE SCHEDULE WITH THEIR PHYSICIANS.
The TRUTH, however, MUST BE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD before ANY PARENT willingly places their child’s life at RISK by vaccinating OR abstaining.
DON’T BE FOOLED INTO BELIEVING THEY ARE RISK FREE!