What parameters must be established to give a newborn the best chances for growing up HEALTHY today? Have you ever questioned this or simply believed a HEALTHY outcome was inevitable? A child develops in a similar manner to the way a plant develops. Let’s look at the two together.
A seed is planted in soil containing a nutritional source to initiate a process of growth.
A human egg is fertilized and planted into a uterus that provides a nutritional source to initiate a process of growth.
A plant will develop and will be sprayed with pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. The residue of the toxins from these “treatments” will be absorbed by the plant along with the nutrients in the soil. It is important to realize these sprays do NOT ENHANCE THE NUTRITIONAL VALUE IN THESE PLANTS.
A fetus will develop and will receive the residues of pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and insecticides from the food consumed by the mother. It is important to realize these toxins do NOT ENHANCE THE NUTRITIONAL VALUE IN THIS FOOD SUPPLY TO THE FETUS.
When the plant produces the end product it is “treated” to “preserve the length of LIFE.” As a result, food producers use any of 14,000 laboratory-made additives to make our food appear fresher, more attractive or last longer on the shelves. Again, it is important to realize this treatment DOES NOT CREATE AN ADDED HEALTH VALUE to the end product. It is used for APPEARANCE sake to:
CREATE A FALSE BELIEF OF SUPERIOR QUALITY FOR BETTER “NUTRITIONAL HEALTH
When the mother gives birth to the neonate (newborn,) treatment is provided for the “preservation of LIFE.” During the first 6 months of life the newborn will receive 17 rounds of laboratory made additives, preservatives, adjuvants, viral and bacterial genetic components (also known as vaccines.) Again, it is important to realize this treatment DOES NOT CREATE AN ADDED HEALTH VALUE to the “end product” (the new born.) The new born is NOT HEALTHIER following a vaccination. Is it possible the vaccine is perceived by the parent to:
CREATE A FALSE SENSE OF BETTER HEALTH?
Whether you support or oppose this concept of development (food vs. child,) these treatments discussed do not:
PRODUCE BETTER HEALTHIER END RESULTS
as measured by nutritional value in food.
as measured by physical and mental development in newborns and infants.
The chemicals used in food create longer shelf life (NOT HEALTHIER FOODS.) This creates convenience for the customer, but causes complications from ingesting toxic chemicals.
The viral and bacterial genetic components along with the chemical preservatives injected in newborns and young infants are claimed to reduce morbidity and mortality (NOT CREATE HEALTHIER CHILDREN.) Following this protocol is convenient for doctors and creates greater compliance among parents while subjecting a segment of their children to LIFELONG NEUROLOGICAL INJURIES.
There is understandable FEAR elicited when parents are told by their doctors that abstaining from these treatments places their children at serious health risks. This FEAR is magnified by one sided BIASED reporting seen on TV, newspapers and magazines. I call this concept the ALL OR NOTHING approach. If every child isn’t treated following this protocol, the average consumer has been convinced by the health care industry that catastrophic events will follow.
Why then are Amish children whose vaccine participation levels (on the low end at 6% within the conservative Swartentruber Amish and the high end for the non conservatives at approximately 63%) not succumbing to these diseases and their potential life altering outcomes? Why aren’t they subjected to higher morbidity and mortality rates resulting from the diseases they aren’t being “protected” from?
What about other cultures and DEVELOPED countries with populations of children unvaccinated? Have you heard about these populations suffering any increases in morbidity and mortality as a result on abstaining from vaccinations?
FEAR and MANDATE are two inappropriate methods to achieve consumer compliance. Have you ever heard of:
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Dr. Suzanne Humphries
Dr. Daniel Neides
Dr. Mark Hyman
Dr. Jeffrey Bland
Dr. Kelly Brogan
These are just a few doctors and licensed health care providers that have studied vaccines and offer scientific evidence justifying CONCERNS about our current vaccination program. Why have you never heard any of them on major networks revealing the SCIENCE behind their concerns? Why does Dr. Sanjay Gupta receive air time on major networks, but qualified doctors questioning the SCIENCE, SAFETY and EFFICACY are absent in this discussion? Only doctors supporting the current vaccine program get air time. Major networks sponsor Presidential debates so the entire nation can HEAR and LEARN the different sides and strategies of IMPORTANT ISSUES they face. Why isn’t the public entitled to hear a similar public debate among credible professionals representing BOTH sides of this important health topic?
When did we decide we were no longer capable as a nation to make individual health care decisions for our families and granted our government the right to mandate policy instead?
Life is rarely ALL or NOTHING. The truth is often found somewhere between these two points. Whether you choose to support or oppose the current vaccination program, it is crucial to understand that vaccines (just like chemical treatments used on plants)
DO NOT CREATE HEALTH.
HEALTHY LIFESTYLE CHOICES
PRACTICED BY OUR CHILDREN AND REINFORCED BY THEIR PARENTS
PROVIDE THE BEST DEFENSES AGAINST ALL DISEASES.