THIS ARTICLE IS 900 WORDS. IF YOU CAN MAKE THE TIME PLEASE READ IT IN ITS ENTIRETY. THANK YOU.
It is difficult to write an article about vaccinations without the reader questioning the writer’s motives. Therefore, rather than make GENERALIZATIONS about ALL VACCINES by handpicking the facts that support biased conclusions, I am going to share information put forth by the COCHRANE DATABASE SYSTEMS REVIEW. (The Cochrane Collaboration, is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental organization consisting of a group of more than 37,000 volunteers in more than 130 countries. This organization is well respected by the medical community as well as the various scientists, researchers and advocate organizations.)
I will limit the information to ONLY 1 SPECIFIC VACCINE (the INFLUENZA VACCINE) provided to children starting at 6 months of age.
We can all agree the intended purpose of getting this vaccine starting at 6 months of age is to protect the newborn from the possible complications caused by this virus. This vaccine is manufactured using either a LIVE (attenuated) virus or a DEAD (inactive) virus. Children under the age of two are given the vaccine containing the DEAD VIRUS to reduce the dangers of having a LIVE one injected into their immature immune systems. Has the science proven the LONG TERM SAFETY and EFFICACY of using this DEAD virus vaccine in children starting at 6 months of age?
The Cochrane publication included fifty-one studies with 294,159 observations. They found:
“In children under two, the efficacy of the inactivated vaccine was similar to the PLACEBO.”
This means the inactivated (“dead”) virus vaccine:
produced an outcome WITHOUT ANY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE FROM THOSE CHILDREN 6 MONTHS OF AGE WHO WERE NOT VACCINATED!
The authors also stated the following:
“Influenza vaccines ARE EFFICACIOUS in children OLDER THAN TWO but little evidence is available for children under two. No safety comparisons could be carried out, emphasizing the need for the presentation of VACCINE SAFETY DATA in future studies.”
“IT WAS SURPRISING TO FIND ONLY ONE STUDY OF INACTIVATED VACCINE IN CHILDREN UNDER TWO YEARS, GIVEN CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS TO VACCINATE HEALTHY CHILDREN FROM SIX MONTHS OLD IN THE USA AND CANADA.”
In conclusion they stated:
If immunization in children is to be recommended as a public health policy, large-scale studies assessing important outcomes and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required.
Based on these findings, why does the vaccine schedule mandate the inclusion of this SPECIFIC influenza vaccine (at 6 months of age) if it has NOT PROVEN ITSELF more efficacious than a PLACEBO? The Cochrane organization has also recommended the inclusion of the VACCINE SAFETY DATA for this SPECIFIC VACCINE. Where is it? It has NEVER been submitted.
This article is NOT intended to support or oppose the concept of vaccinations. It was written to question this SPECIFIC VACCINE and the JUSTIFICATION for requiring its administering at 6 months of age based on the independent findings. What’s even further disconcerting is the CDC’S VACCINE SCHEDULE recommends a SECOND innoculation using this SAME INEFFECTIVE VACCINE 4 weeks after its first application
FOR ALL CHILDREN
WHERE’S THE INDEPENDENT SCIENCE PROVING THE BENEFIT?
If you are a parent, grandparent, guardian or simply know someone with a young child, I encourage you to ask (or recommend they ask) the pediatrician for the INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THEY POSSESS demonstrating the NEED for this SPECIFIC VACCINE at 6 months of age. Even the Cochrane data claims efficacy doesn’t begin until TWO YEARS of age. We can’t accept the research provided by the manufacturers of these vaccines because it clearly demonstrates a conflict of interest.
Why expose a 6 month old child to a combination of chemicals that offers NO BETTER PROTECTION than a PLACEBO? Do you realize a child of only 6 months in age (if they followed the CDC’s vaccine schedule) will have already had a minimum of 14 inoculations. There is NO SCIENCE showing the SAFETY of this vaccine schedule based on the potential cumulative effects. Again, don’t take my word for it; ask your pediatrician to provide the INDEPENDENT RESEARCH showing the LONG TERM SAFETY STUDIES combining these various vaccinations.
THEY WON’T BE ABLE TO!
When a child is only 6 months old, they rely on your judgement and wisdom. When an article like this provides information revealing potential flaws in the “SYSTEM” that can alter the health and quality of a child’s life, does it not create enough concern to make all of us PAUSE and consider the VALIDITY of its content?
A German philosopher (Arthur Schopenhauer) once stated, “ALL NEW TRUTHS PASS THROUGH 3 PHASES.“
PHASE ONE: The TRUTH is first ridiculed.
PHASE TWO: The TRUTH is violently opposed.
PHASE THREE: The TRUTH is accepted as being “self evident.”
Is it possible the TRUTH revealed in this article has simply not reached PHASE THREE? Does it make this TRUTH any less REAL?
Please consider my request to ask your pediatricians for their INDEPENDENT RESEARCH corroborating the efficacy and safety in the treatments they wish to provide. Please, don’t just hand a 6 month old child over to a doctor because “everyone else does.”
DID YOU KNOW:
Today, between the ages of zero to eighteen, 70 doses of 16 vaccines will be mandated by our government to attend public schooling. How much time have you invested in understanding the RISKS AND REWARDS associated with them?
In 1983, 23 doses of 8 vaccines were given between the ages of zero and 18. Ask yourself, how much healthier has our youth become over the last 33 years? Has the mortality rate gone down as a result of these additional vaccines.
Why then, are we being mandated to receive more and more and more?
THE ANSWER IS NOT MONEY; THE ANSWER IS YOUR COMPLIANCE!