Part of the Hippocratic Oath is to SWEAR to NEVER DO HARM to a patient. Obviously, this refers to intentional harm. What if, however, there are questions whether a procedure MAY cause harm to a patient. The moral and ethical answer is to GET ANSWERS BEFORE proceeding with these treatments.
I pose to the reader the possibility that POLITICS and POWER may be factors compromising ethical standards in healthcare. Today, we are currently facing controversy and potential conflicts of interest as we proceed through our presidential election process. What we may fail to realize is that these conflicts of interest extend well beyond the White House.
As a doctor WITH QUESTIONS STILL UNANSWERED, it is my obligation to share public safety concerns when those in positions of authority refuse to allow proper (independent) investigations to evaluate research conclusions. This jeopardizes EVERY DOCTOR’S right to know whether the treatments they provide are truly safe and in the patient’s best interest.
The measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR vaccine) has ad nauseam been discussed in the media as a SAFE vaccine PROVEN to be UNAFFILIATED with AUTISM. During senate hearings on vaccine safety in February 2014, Rear Admiral Ann Schuchat, MD (principal deputy director at the CDC) and “top immunization official in the United States” emphatically stated NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND PROVING VACCINATIONS CAUSED AUTISM.
WHAT REASONABLE ARGUMENT CAN BE MADE TO QUESTION THIS HIGHLY CREDENTIALED SPECIALIST?
HOW ABOUT FACTS:
Dr. William W. Thompson, a Senior Scientist and Epidemiologist at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Immunization Safety Branch), decided to SPEAK UP and SHARE the vaccine-autism connection.
“My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”
All in all, Dr. Thompson wanted documents turned over to the Justice Department revealing other scientists covered up data showing African American boys under age three who received the MMR vaccine were SIGNIFICANTLY MORE likely to get autism. Recent spikes in those rates are consistent with these findings. He sent an email to Dr. Melinda Wharton (currently serving as the Acting Director for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases) stating:
(IN REGARDS TO THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE:) “I have also tried to bring your attention to some potentially sensitive legal issues surrounding what documents we should provide for this study.”E-mail to Dr. Melinda Wharton
The CDC and certain scientists have tried (and succeeded up until now) to hide this scientific and statistical evidence, according to Dr. Thompson and his full confession. He told Dr. Brian Hooker:
“It’s all there.” 34 PAGE LETTER Letter To The CDC and U.S. Dept. Of Health and Human Services OUTLINING MANIPULATION FINDINGS OF RESEARCH. “This is the lowest point in my career, that I went along with that paper. I have great shame now when I meet families of kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem.”
Mass Media Blackout
All of this historic information is completely blacked out by the mass media, including television, newspapers, magazines, hospital protocol, scientific journals, peer review publications, and any other business that sponsors allopathic chemical medications. Why are we, THE CONSUMERS, only permitted exposure to the information that supports the actions and policies of our government and healthcare institutions? How can we be expected to make intelligent medical decisions in life in light of this revelation? Apparently, it is our responsibility to BLINDLY ACCEPT THEIR “WORD” and follow protocols established even when legitimate questions remain unanswered.
LAND OF THE FREE? GOVERNED BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE?