Whooping Cough: Investing Medical Advertising $$$ in TV Commercials

5fcb8905a4e65665dfdbdcf194141ad1Pertussis is the medical term for whooping cough. The DTaP vaccine (Diphtheria, Tetanus and acellular Pertussis) is the vaccine recommended by pediatricians for children starting at 2 months of age. It’s interesting with all the childhood vaccines to choose from, whooping cough is getting the most TV commercial air time.

The following information comes from a paper written by Dr. Suzanne Humphries, M.D. It provides a good example how scientific material can be presented in a manner that creates conclusions that are misleading and falsely perceived by the public. These types of stories must be shared with the public, not with the purpose of discrediting a health care profession, but rather to provide important information to the public so they can make well informed decisions for their own welfare and the welfare of their families.

The Medical Explanation For The Benefits Of The Pertussis Vaccine: by Dr. Paul Offit, M.D. (an American pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases and an expert on vaccines, immunology, and virology.)

“Whooping cough (pertussis) is a devastating infection. Before a vaccine was first used in the United States in the 1940s, about three hundred thousand cases of whooping cough caused seven thousand deaths every year, almost all in young children. Now, because of the pertussis vaccine, fewer than thirty children die every year from the disease.”

Another study on whooping cough and the whooping cough vaccine was published in 1988 in the journal “Pediatrics.”

“In the United States, pertussis has been successfully controlled by routine mass immunization of infants and children. In the pre-vaccine era, there were 115,000 to 270,000 cases of pertussis and 5,000 to 10,000 deaths due to the disease each year. During the last 10 years, there have been 1,200 to 4,000 cases and five to ten deaths per year.” (The full reference for this is: James D. Cherry, MD MSc; Philip A. Brunell, MD; Gerald S. Golden, MD; and David T. Karzon, MD, “Report on the Task Force on Pertussis and Pertussis Immunization—1988,” Pediatrics, June 1988, vol. 81, no. 6, Part 2, p. 939.)

These explanations sound convincing and prove that the mortality rate from pertussis has dramatically been reduced since the 1940’s. The wording makes us assume there is a direct causal effect between the vaccine and the current mortality rate. Does the science and statistics support this conclusion?

Dr. Humphries states the following:

When we look at the actual data, we see that although many people did die from whooping cough in the early part of the 1900s, by the time the vaccine had been introduced the death rate in the United States had declined by more than 90 percent. Using the source that was referenced to make the statement in the Pediatrics paper, we see that the decline in deaths from the peak was approximately 92 percent before the introduction of the DTP vaccine.

8sNaWp Part II

Notice, however, that the medical explanation never mentioned that 92% of the mortalities had already been eliminated before the implementation of the vaccine. They simply mentioned the mortality rates prior to 1940 and then the rates today. This is a classic example how facts are revealed intentionally to create a perception of truth rather than an actual depiction of truth.

What contributed to the reduction in cases and fatalities leading up to the introduction of the vaccine? Many researchers have concluded that improved hygiene, sanitation, nutrition, labor laws, electricity, chlorination, refrigeration, pasteurization, and many other facets placed children and adults at lower risks for ALL contagious diseases.

“It is dangerous to let the public behind the scenes. They are easily disillusioned and then they are angry with you, for it was the illusion they loved.”

-W. Somerset Maugham-

Is it necessary to promote a fallacy by using TV advertising dollars to keep this illusion alive? We deserve honest explanations by the institutions we rely on for information regarding our health and welfare. It is unfair to our medical doctors to force them to follow mandatory vaccination schedules they may disagree with. Their employment is potentially on the line if their vaccine quotas are not met. Are you surprised that doctors are pressured by institutions that employ them in this manner? I can certainly understand why medical decision making by pediatricians may be biased. Who wants to be fired from their job?

I don’t care whether you love or hate vaccines. I care that truthful information is available to the public and that doctors share the various sources of research with their patients so they can choose from ALL options. To tell the world that vaccines are the ONLY OPTION to avoid disease reduces the credibility and integrity of the health care institutions and doctors behind this claim. Too much controversy over this topic within the medical profession itself remains to be this dogmatic.

Were you aware that 90%+ of the whooping cough fatalities had resolved naturally prior to the introduction of the pertussis vaccine?

Can you see why continued dialogue among all doctors regarding vaccines is imperative to safeguard the public from false claims and potential abuse by the health care system?



  1. Normally, I am not for more government intervention, but this demonstrates the need for some kind of reform. Big Pharmacies throwing money into ads that distort the truth (providing us with the illusions that we love) should be unlawful. Then, again, I imagine they have their lobbyists helping their “noble” cause. My friend, you caould have easily named your blog the “Eye Opening Blog,” because that is exactly what you have done.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. In cases of health, I believe the response for change will come from grass root efforts. I do not believe the big businesses are interested in costly changes to the systems in place. Education, education and more education as well as persistence is my attempt to make the explanations to the readers MAKE SENSE. This does NOT MEAN I believe I have all the answers. It DOES MEAN I want to share my answers with the world with the knowledge there is no personal gain in my efforts. I don’t want to generate defensive reactions. I want to generate better communication through a greater sharing of information to help each of us make the best personal choices for our own individual health.

      I hope the “eye opening affect” of my blog achieves it goal. It is a blessing waking each day to finding new ideas and organizing them in a manner that might affect the physical as well as emotional quality of life of another person.

      Your encouragement is heart warming! Thank you.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Education, education, education–I agree!

    A friend of ours was diagnosed with Whooping Cough about six months ago. He is a 20-something adult who is a smoker. He was treated and recovered fairly quickly once it was determined what he suffered from, and no one else in the household contracted the disease. If treatment is so readily available for this ailment, I would think vaccinations would continue to decline. Is that not the case?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No, no, no,no! There is a massive investment by the medical community to increase the vaccinations for whooping cough for children AND ADULTS. This friend of yours that contracted the disease “naturally” will have a natural immunity that will last up to approximately 12 years vs the vaccine good for approximately 4 years.

      What makes this situation more troubling is the following:
      The fear of giving antibiotics unnecessarily is based on the virulence created by the bacteria as a result. What makes anyone think the bacteria we vaccinate against won’t create the same virulent changes in these bacteria? Most of the childhood vaccines are common illnesses that last 3-5 days without complications. This provides the best form of immunity for ALL people. As adults (that already had these diseases as children) are exposed to these children with the disease, it prolongs their natural immunity without getting symptomatically sick.

      I had the measles, mumps, chicken pox just like most of the children that grew up in my generation. These attempts to safeguard children (while generating huge profits) do not meet the standards for efficacy. Diseases with high risk potential for lethal or debilitating outcomes need medical intervention IF the treatment itself is tested for safety BY INDEPENDENT SOURCES! Injecting foreign substances into children’s bodies to safe guard against a disease that produces symptoms typical of colds or a minor flu for 3-5 days needs to be evaluated OBJECTIVELY by parents rather than relying ONLY on doctors that provide this service for profit.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thank you for that explanation. Wow, 12 yrs vs 4 yrs that’s amazing! My friend was pretty sick before going to hospital, but better quickly once diagnosis was made.

        Liked by 1 person

Your comment can positively impact the lives of others.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: